If you need to control my dialogue because I am not saying what you want?

If you need you control my friends because I am not spending time with who you want?

If you need to control my money because I am not spending it on what you want?

If you need to control my bodily functions because they are not responding how you want?

If you need to control my thoughts because I am not thinking what you want?

If you need to control my dreams because I am not dreaming what you want?

Who is the one on the power trip because I definitely ain’t free.

Funny how you use to like me for me but now you are changing everything about me and I resent and have no respect for someone who says sorry you can’t be you.

The other funny thing is, if you are controlling me to a point to make me do certain bad things to prove your point that I am bad.

Weren’t you in the wrong because I did nothing bad you said I did.

Also doesn’t that control define

Leading the witness

Simple Definition of leading the witness

Leading the witness occurs when an attorney asks a question that suggests the desired answer or puts words into the witness’s mouth. This form of questioning is generally improper during direct examination, when an attorney questions their own witness. However, it is permitted during cross-examination or when questioning a witness declared hostile or adverse by the court.

Or does it define false confessions

Types of Police-Induced False Confessions

• Coerced-Compliant Confessions: The suspect knows they are innocent, but they confess to escape a stressful or painful interrogation, stop threats, or gain a promised reward like a lighter sentence or a break.
• Coerced-Internalized (or Persuaded) Confessions: The suspect becomes so exhausted, confused, or manipulated that they actually come to believe they committed the crime, often due to misleading evidence or fatigue.
• Voluntary False Confessions: This is a separate category where a person confesses without any police coercion, sometimes due to a mental health condition, a desire for notoriety, or extreme guilt over another matter. [1, 2]

According to A&E, “In the case of interrogation, it’s accusatory, guilt-presumptive, confession-driven and it’s based on techniques of pressure and persuasion.”

If you are calling what you do as psychological warfare, then I am sure there is even a point at which that crosses the line.

So I ask again if you have to have so much control in order to get the narrative or response you want, is it real and sustainable?

-Jennie Nawrocki